| |||||||||||||
extensions.gnome.org launchesextensions.gnome.org launchesPosted Dec 2, 2011 18:20 UTC (Fri) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)In reply to: extensions.gnome.org launches by MisterIO Parent article: extensions.gnome.org launches
I'm not quite clear on what you mean. The CPU certainly has to tell the GPU where to draw the textures, but that's not a significant amount of work.
(Log in to post comments)
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 3, 2011 15:07 UTC (Sat) by MisterIO (guest, #36192) [Link]
I was thinking about dropping this, since I doubt this can be interesting to anyone else other than myself, but, since I answered to another comment, here I am again. What I meant is that probably there is some other work done in the background by the gnome-shell which takes too much cpu time, not directly related to the simple act of just drawing textures.
extensions.gnome.org launches Posted Dec 3, 2011 21:20 UTC (Sat) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950) [Link]
Could be. We have a shell performance stats website at http://shell-perf.gnome.org/home. I guess we should check how it behaves with 100+ windows. Of course in a benchmark 100+ windows might be a few ms slower, but it should not be noticeable for a user (which is a 30% slowdown from what I heard).
|
|||||||||||||