LWN.net Logo

Improving ext4: bigalloc, inline data, and metadata checksums

Improving ext4: bigalloc, inline data, and metadata checksums

Posted Nov 30, 2011 22:07 UTC (Wed) by yokem_55 (subscriber, #10498)
In reply to: Improving ext4: bigalloc, inline data, and metadata checksums by walex
Parent article: Improving ext4: bigalloc, inline data, and metadata checksums

I agree that both jfs and disk based RW udf are way underrated. I use jfs on our laptop as it supposedly tends to have less cpu usage, and thus is better for reducing power usage. UDF, if properly supported by the kernel, would make a fantastic fs for accessing data in dual boot situations as Windows has pretty good support and it doesn't have the limitations of vfat nor does it require a nasty, awful, performance sucking hack like ntfs-3g.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds