| |||||||||||||
Long-time and happy XFCE userLong-time and happy XFCE userPosted Nov 16, 2011 16:12 UTC (Wed) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)In reply to: Long-time and happy XFCE user by Los__D Parent article: Why GNOME refugees love Xfce (Register)
I simply stated that compared to XFCE, GNOME2 looks good (in that department). That's totally subjective. What is objective is that GNOME (and to some extent KDE) are attempting to make major changes to the desktop and to people's workflow, which many people do not like. Also, GNOME 3 objectively has regressions (for example, focus-follows-mouse is somewhat broken compared to GNOME 2.) I have to say that KDE 4 looks a lot nicer than XFCE. But looks aren't everything; IMO KDE 4's workflow is a lot harder to deal with than XFCE's, and the same applies to GNOME 3. There's something to be said for experimentation, but as I wrote earlier, if the GNOME developers consider GNOME to be a testbed for experimental GUI work, they should state that up front so would-be GNOME users know what they're getting into. See http://lwn.net/Articles/466909/ If you want a stable desktop environment that uses a tried-and-true interface and focuses on stability and incremental improvement, then neither GNOME nor KDE is appropriate. If you want a desktop environment prone to wild experimentation by developers, then sure: GNOME and KDE fit the bill.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||