LWN.net Logo

Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation...

Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation...

Posted Nov 11, 2011 0:18 UTC (Fri) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
In reply to: Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation... by khim
Parent article: Why GNOME refugees love Xfce (Register)

> You can drive it from command line using cnetworkmanager...

You can't manage wireless connections through it (adding, removing, etc.). Only nm-applet supports it. You could hack the XML config files I suppose, but wpa_supplicant.conf is easier in that case (except the root requirement, but to avoid XML and a session dbus for just one app, I'll take it).

> I'm not sure I remember the time when I was last forced to think about the fact that I have different SSIDs at home and at work, etc.

wpa_supplicant.conf allows you to do the same. The priority= setting allows it to choose in the face of choice as well. I don't recall NM having that last I used it.

The only practical difference between NM and wpa_supplicant in my experience is that NM will connect and drop automatically where I need to do "ifup" manually. However, where NM will drop at a network disruption, ifup will stay up until I take it down. That, IMO, is well worth the slight inconvenience of an ifup at boot (which is in the history right alongside exec startx).


(Log in to post comments)

Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation...

Posted Nov 12, 2011 7:34 UTC (Sat) by tom.prince (subscriber, #70680) [Link]

In fact, the network-manager configuration files are simple ini style config files.

Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation...

Posted Nov 13, 2011 14:18 UTC (Sun) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

That's certainly an improvement.

Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation...

Posted Nov 17, 2011 12:51 UTC (Thu) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link]

I find that with wpa_supplicant I can ifup wlan0 on boot and then walk between networks without manual ifdown or ifup and stay connected, so long as some kind of configuration for the network exists. Having a generic fallback for open networks is really all you need; I'm surprised that such a fallback isn't supplied by default by wpa_supplicant.

Well, it looks like start of Network Manager reimplementation...

Posted Nov 17, 2011 23:21 UTC (Thu) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

True, but I don't add a catch-all open network section simply because I'd like some notification when that happens.

Now if wpa_supplicant could automatically do RADIUS web logins instead of forcing me to realize that things aren't going through and then opening uzbl before firing offlineimap off, that'd be awesome.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds