Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for June 20, 2013
Pencil, Pencil, and Pencil
Dividing the Linux desktop
LWN.net Weekly Edition for June 13, 2013
A report from pgCon 2013
The cure to that is to mean to commit autoconf/automake-generated files.
KS2011: Afternoon topics
Posted Oct 31, 2011 20:46 UTC (Mon) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
Which, IMO, is worse than having them in the source tree after their generation. The autoconf/automake *generated* files belong in the build directory.
Posted Oct 31, 2011 20:55 UTC (Mon) by fuhchee (subscriber, #40059)
If you say so. :-)
Posted Nov 1, 2011 14:30 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
It's certainly not true if your source directory is a release tarball (or other release medium). Autoconf et al should have been run for you by that point, and the result tested. That way end users don't need anything but a shell and ordinary build tools to run the build. (This is one area where cmake falls down: all the builders need a copy of it.)
Posted Nov 1, 2011 14:41 UTC (Tue) by fuhchee (subscriber, #40059)
In practice, if people are pragmatic, it's fine.
Developers can regenerate the files at will with any version that works.
In the case of version control branch merge problems, regenerate them again.
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds