| |||||||||||||
Another kernel RAID5 implementationAnother kernel RAID5 implementationPosted Oct 20, 2011 16:26 UTC (Thu) by mebrown (subscriber, #7960)In reply to: Another kernel RAID5 implementation by jake Parent article: Another kernel RAID5 implementation
It seems to be a common case for people to report typos in comments and then for you to ask them to use the email address.
Perhaps you should add a "report typo" button somewhere in the comment posting process to divert these?
(Log in to post comments)
Another kernel RAID5 implementation Posted Oct 20, 2011 17:40 UTC (Thu) by Slumberthud (subscriber, #45657) [Link]
Amen to that.
Another kernel RAID5 implementation Posted Oct 20, 2011 19:58 UTC (Thu) by cladisch (✭ supporter ✭, #50193) [Link] Or a notice like "Please do not post typos in the article as comments, send them to lwn@lwn.net instead." right above the comment box. But there is reason to believe that not everybody would notice it … ;-)
Another kernel RAID5 implementation Posted Oct 21, 2011 12:19 UTC (Fri) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link]
Unnecessarily chatty web sites have long since trained me to scan right past blocks of text without reading it, especially if I think I know what I'm doing. Buttons, however, draw more attention.
Another kernel RAID5 implementation Posted Oct 23, 2011 18:46 UTC (Sun) by smoogen (subscriber, #97) [Link]
I like: Reports of typos via comments versus proper form will result in a 2.00 sir-tax [misspelling on purpose.]
Another kernel RAID5 implementation Posted Oct 25, 2011 15:16 UTC (Tue) by mebrown (subscriber, #7960) [Link]
Ooooh! I know!
<code>
|
|||||||||||||