Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 5, 2013
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
If you want the work done, do it. Just whining nobody else wants to do it for you won't get it done.
Kernel.org's road to recovery
Posted Oct 10, 2011 0:15 UTC (Mon) by malor (subscriber, #2973)
Dude, if I could read minds, I'd be using my superpower in much more interesting ways.
I can't be honest for other people. It is not possible.
Posted Oct 10, 2011 2:32 UTC (Mon) by vonbrand (subscriber, #4458)
I thought you were interested in possible security implications of bugs. What the author of the patch was thinking at the time is irrelevant, she might have been daydreaming of the vacation with her boyfriend when she noticed a potential integer wraparound.
Posted Oct 10, 2011 22:23 UTC (Mon) by malor (subscriber, #2973)
If a developer knows a bug has a definite security impact, I want to know that. That's all. Nobody else can know what's in his or her head, or read what's on the bug reports that have been submitted.
Be honest about known security implications, instead of hiding them. It's not a difficult request. It probably takes more work to come up with euphemisms to hide the security issue, than it does to just write what they're actually doing.
Posted Oct 10, 2011 22:25 UTC (Mon) by malor (subscriber, #2973)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds