LWN.net Logo

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Noted patent troll Intellectual Ventures (IV) has filed a patent suit against Motorola Mobility, according to The Wall Street Journal. Evidently IV has been successful in getting other handset makers to license the patents, but there is an interesting twist in this particular suit: "The lawsuit also creates a potentially awkward scenario, with a firm partly backed by Google now presenting a Google acquisition target with a new legal headache. Intellectual Ventures disclosed Google's investment in the firm in May. [...] Bellevue, Wash.-based Intellectual Ventures filed its new suit in Delaware, alleging that Motorola Mobility has infringed on six patents related to transferring files among computers and technology used in an 'entertainment device,' according to the complaint."
(Log in to post comments)

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 6, 2011 21:24 UTC (Thu) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]

Pretty soon the graph of 'who-is-suing-whom' is going to be a complete graph.

I think I'm going to write a visualization which depicts lawsuits as nuclear missiles flying into headquarters with explosion size proportional to the cost of settlement/license deal.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 6, 2011 21:33 UTC (Thu) by arjan (subscriber, #36785) [Link]

remember that there's always one group of people who benefits from all this: the lawyers.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 2:57 UTC (Fri) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]

Not just the lawyers.

What we have here is government receiving payments from connected firms in order to establish special privileges in the market place.

You document what you want to have a monopoly over, get lawyers to vet over it, submit it to the government, and then pay your fees to government and then the government will use it's police state to ensure your profitability. Of course there are special rules and such because the government prefers to maintain and illusion of legitimacy in it's actions.

=================================================

It's a modern form of Syndicalism.

In case you didn't know what that is, most European folks probably have a decent idea, but it's a system were you have the 'producers' control the economic system.

The leftists tended to believe that the 'workers' were the 'producers' so they fight to make the workers the controlling factors through trade unionism and such. The rightists tend to believe that the large capitalists were the big producers and wanted them to be in charge of a 'syndicalist' system.

Roughly 90 years ago a group of rather pragmatic bunch* of leftists in Italy managed to politically please both types of groups (and thus get their help to take over the democratic government via legal elections) by simply making both types of groups controllers of the economy. They decided to have both groups representing both types help run the government through committee process.

*(pragmatic in the sense they were not driven by religious-like ideological theories like the communists were)

This became known as the Italian Corporative state, among other things. During it's heyday it was lauded as a huge step forward. It embraced all groups and loved religion, as long it was approved by the state. It was highly respected by people like Winston Churchill for it's ability to bring order out of chaos. It was admired by Franklin Roosevelt for it's highly progressive economy and public works. And a historically significant group of people in Germany thought it was a fantastic way to run a country.

In modern America the state is effective evolved along very similar lines; abet in a much more awkward and slower manner then the Italians did. Not so much clubbing. Tear gas and electrical weapons are cleaner. Plus maintaining a huge percentage of the population in prisons keeps is a great way to generate money and political favors from regional economies.

Although this time around they added a third group of 'producers' to help run the economy: 'Lawyers and Idea men'. Since, you know, the vast majority of politicians in the USA are lawyers. They naturally hold themselves and their profession in very high esteem. They are not going to cut themselves out of the loop for the sake of some outmoded labor vs owner dogma. Thinkers are just as important as accountants and factory workers.

Very pragmatic group of people, you know.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 16:17 UTC (Fri) by Aliasundercover (subscriber, #69009) [Link]

Those people are the majority of the legislature and essentially all of the judiciary.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 7:54 UTC (Fri) by Lennie (subscriber, #49641) [Link]

There is an older graph here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jul/26/google-s...

And an article about Intellectual Ventures here:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/07/26/138576167/when-...

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 8, 2011 13:55 UTC (Sat) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402) [Link]

I fear the only thing that could stop the rot in the mobile patent world would be for Google to donate all their newly acquired patents to the OIN on the condition that the OIN add android to their list of protected linux infrastructure.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 10, 2011 0:58 UTC (Mon) by jlayton (subscriber, #31672) [Link]

Sadly, that won't stop trolls like IV. They do not actually produce anything, so they are in no real danger of running afoul of any of OIN's patents.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 3:37 UTC (Fri) by Wout (subscriber, #8750) [Link]

I'm happy to announce that I read the company name as Intellectual Vultures.
Though that may be disrespectful to vultures...

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 4:31 UTC (Fri) by slashdot (guest, #22014) [Link]

I guess suing themselves is the next frontier for patent trolls.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 6:48 UTC (Fri) by joib (guest, #8541) [Link]

... and then have the tax payers bail them out, like the finance industry? Excellent game plan. :)

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 8:50 UTC (Fri) by dgm (subscriber, #49227) [Link]

Damn! I was just about filing a patent for this!
But wait, hasn't the system been changed recently to "first to file"? Wooot! I think I will fill anyway, and sue those bastar...I mean...gentlemen to death!

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 7, 2011 13:32 UTC (Fri) by gmaxwell (subscriber, #30048) [Link]

Our new first to file doesn't help you there: Their prior public practice of the technique would preclude your patent.

People, quick to assume the worst of any regulatory change, often make out f2f as worse than it is. At least for us in the open world who constantly make our inventions public shortly after their conception and don't depend on patents its not something that has that much impact.

Intellectual Ventures Files Patent Suit Against Motorola Mobility (The Wall Street Journal)

Posted Oct 25, 2011 10:06 UTC (Tue) by jdv (subscriber, #712) [Link]

Well, Samsung was suing Apple to get an injunction against selling IPads, which contain lots of Samsung chips... That's getting close to suing themselves :)

Cyclic Sueing

Posted Oct 7, 2011 9:15 UTC (Fri) by juliank (subscriber, #45896) [Link]

So finally, legal conflicts get cyclic. We have all waited for this.

Copyright © 2011, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds