LWN.net Logo

A new approach to opportunistic suspend

A new approach to opportunistic suspend

Posted Sep 29, 2011 16:04 UTC (Thu) by kiko (subscriber, #69905)
In reply to: A new approach to opportunistic suspend by khim
Parent article: A new approach to opportunistic suspend

How can it not be possible to provide a compelling subset of the existing use cases?

At any rate, you have a valid point that what we are arguing here is for a capability that has the potential of addressing a major class of problem that application developers face. Perhaps better than outlining the use cases individually might be describing the class of problems wakelocks let you address. I think Paul McKenney actually tried this a while back, but it rambled on too much -- but maybe John has the guts to run a more focused thread on the subject.

Alternatively, we could motivate the kernel community into appreciating that while they don't see the feature addressing their own use cases, a population of Android application developers are relying on the functionality, and it would be the responsible thing to either support them or convert them to use something else.


(Log in to post comments)

A new approach to opportunistic suspend

Posted Sep 29, 2011 20:23 UTC (Thu) by jrn (subscriber, #64214) [Link]

> Alternatively, we could motivate the kernel community into appreciating that while they don't see the feature addressing their own use cases, [...]

The usual approach in that case is for people who do see value in the feature to join the kernel community. Hard work, but possible.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds