| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Maybe SCO had a pointMaybe SCO had a pointPosted Aug 22, 2003 12:32 UTC (Fri) by Arker (guest, #14205)In reply to: Maybe SCO had a point by adamruth Parent article: Maybe SCO had a point
It's my understanding that that's a no. The code in question is descended from v32 or an earlier version of AT&T Unix. I did find, and the article mentions, some very similar code in 2.11BSD, but on close examination it looks like that's probably a separate modification of v32. 4.4BSDLite (the first certain unencumbered version) doesn't seem to have it. You're welcome to take a look yourself, I didn't look too closely, just ran a couple pattern matches.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||