| |||||||||||||
LPC: Coping with hardware diversityLPC: Coping with hardware diversityPosted Sep 15, 2011 17:51 UTC (Thu) by PaulMcKenney (subscriber, #9624)In reply to: LPC: Coping with hardware diversity by btraynor Parent article: LPC: Coping with hardware diversity
I believe that Mr. Rusling is making a distinction between embedded vendors working with a snapshot of the Linux kernel (which is their traditional approach) on the one hand, and staying close to mainline (and contributing changes/fixes to mainline) on the other.
One motivation for getting embedded developers to come to mainstream Linux events is to get them comfortable with contributing changes/fixes.
So one difference between embedded and desktop is that from what I can see, desktop developers are comfortable contributing upstream. This is becoming increasingly true for embedded developers, but more progress is needed.
Does it all make sense now?
(Log in to post comments)
LPC: Coping with hardware diversity Posted Sep 15, 2011 18:56 UTC (Thu) by btraynor (subscriber, #26672) [Link]
That explanation does make sense, thanks. I guess I get a little antsy when people call for broad, sweeping changes like (in this case) eliminating Embedded Linux conferences.
|
|||||||||||||