Netronome is hiring!

Interested in hardware, diags, validation, Linux, C, ARM, Microcode and low level programming and blazing networks?

Advertise here

Create an account

Subscribe to LWN

LWN.net Weekly Edition for February 9, 2012

XBMC 11 "Eden"

LWN.net Weekly Edition for February 2, 2012

A tempest in a toybox

LWN.net Weekly Edition for January 26, 2012

Printable page

Weekly edition	Kernel	Security	Distributions	Contact Us	Search
Archives	Calendar	Subscribe	Write for LWN	LWN.net FAQ	Sponsors

Maybe SCO had a point

Posted Aug 22, 2003 9:58 UTC (Fri) by daniel (subscriber, #3181)
In reply to: Maybe SCO had a point by ken
Parent article: Maybe SCO had a point

I would say that the two uses of ASSERT makes it quite clear that this is indeed SVr4 code.

Even if it were, the SVr4 code is clearly derived, not an original work.

(Log in to post comments)