| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Maybe SCO had a pointMaybe SCO had a pointPosted Aug 22, 2003 5:23 UTC (Fri) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054)In reply to: Maybe SCO had a point by ekonijn Parent article: Maybe SCO had a point Sorry, I was looking at the ASSERT backwards. I still agree with Jon Corbet's though; the Linux code is closer to the SysV code than to the 32V code.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||