GPL compatibility
Posted Aug 22, 2003 3:36 UTC (Fri) by
BrucePerens (subscriber, #2510)
In reply to:
Maybe SCO had a point by Arker
Parent article:
Maybe SCO had a point
This is moot, because a version of the code was in the public domain, differing from the version used by two uncopyrightable lines.
Even if that were not the case, the advertising clause would only be a problem if a GPL copyright holder sued about it. And even then it would be hard to show that anyone
could ever advertise a feature of the malloc in this driver, so the advertising clause would not activate.
The compatibility issue doesn't work the other way - the BSD license they used does not ban licenses that are incompatible with it.
The lack of attribution is a problem, but one that would create financial damage. If we were to keep the function, we'd have to remediate that.
Bruce
(
Log in to post comments)