I'm running stable - although I have some very few key packages (non-free firmware, virtualbox and wireless hacking tools) from stable-backports, testing and unstable.
I'm sure there are plenty people more as me. The simple fact that stable-backports exist can attest this, not to mention the bugs which are filed against desktop software by people who use stable. All bug reports done through the reportbug tool have a "apt prefers" section which tells which release they are using.
Posted Sep 10, 2011 20:32 UTC (Sat) by przemoc (subscriber, #67594)
[Link]
Same here, i.e. stable with some changes.
Well, not exactly same, because over time not only key packages have been upgraded in my box (like tmux from backports, nvidia-* from testing/wheezy), but even less important ones. OTOH due to bumped versions of dependencies in testing+ (like in case of okular, it needed though lowering KDE4 ver requirement and removing some unsupported &jovie; in index.docbook) or lack of maintainership (like in case of pan), you're sometimes enforced to do your own builds. I also use external repos (for virtualbox or google-chrome).
I don't like adding repos of testing+ in stable explicitly, so I've crafted handy oneliner for getting all packages built from given source one.