Yes, there is a problem
Posted Aug 22, 2003 2:35 UTC (Fri) by
mmarq (guest, #2332)
In reply to:
Yes, there is a problem by cwitty
Parent article:
Maybe SCO had a point
OK, who was the guy ?
"...or maybe it's not a violation at all..."
"We" better make ours minds kickly, because a torrent of FUD is coming this way!
I could have been (i wasent really) the one copying it from 32V, i evolved it for SMP and it happens to be identical to sys V in 2 or 3 lines that weren't in the original algorithm, and in places where IT WAS HELPLESS not to happen...
COULDNT USL OR NOVELL HAVE COPYED IT WHEN IT WAS DEVELOPED FOR SGI SYSTEMS ?
IMHO, "WE" WILL NEVER KNOW IT REALLY!
In Linux it sliped the copyright notice, so what, it dosent make it illegal copying to the point of erasing that code. Why not just incert the proper copyright notice...
Is SCO task to prove precedence, wich they cant, because in such a trivial piece of code they would already have showned black on white evidence...
IN THE SAKE OF THE THRUE, is Linux/OSS community task not to get paranoid, in matters that in my belive they can not prove with "TOTAL EXACTNESS" !
The Linux/OSS is making SCO & Ma$ter win it's FUD, by excess of solicitude
HOW GOOD THOSE SCO & Ma$ter FUD BASTARDS ARE, HEIM ?
(
Log in to post comments)