| |||||||||||||
LPC: Development model diversityLPC: Development model diversityPosted Sep 10, 2011 2:35 UTC (Sat) by allison (subscriber, #56202)In reply to: LPC: Development model diversity by pphaneuf Parent article: LPC: Development model diversity
(Log in to post comments)
LPC: Development model diversity Posted Sep 12, 2011 18:46 UTC (Mon) by daglwn (subscriber, #65432) [Link]
That simply describes the process, not what's wrong with it. I too am curious and there's far too much detailed text there for me to immediately sort out what's "wrong."
LPC: Development model diversity Posted Sep 14, 2011 4:54 UTC (Wed) by ssmith32 (subscriber, #72404) [Link]
>there's far too much detailed text there for me to immediately sort out what's "wrong."
Exactly ;)
Re: What's Wrong With Parrot? Posted Sep 29, 2011 6:14 UTC (Thu) by ldo (subscriber, #40946) [Link]
It seems to me a lot of extra complexity is introduced by the way they use Signed-off-by lines. Theyre trying to use these to record who accepted the pull request into the mainline. Is this even necessary?
How do the Linux kernel folks handle this? (Obvious question I ask every time somebody claims to have a problem using Git.) It seems to me they dont bother with this information, they only record the contributor of the patch, not who accepted it.
|
|||||||||||||