| |||||||||||||
Same interface?Same interface?Posted Aug 31, 2011 15:48 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Same interface? by sebas Parent article: The year of the Linux tablet?
Yes yes indeed. It's sensible to have a menu locked to the top of the screen on a handheld, just as it's sensible to have gestural interfaces on a handheld. The first is broken by a big screen, the second by machines where the screen is not held in your hand. Thus, different interfaces are absolutely required.
It's a shame the GNOME people didn't notice this. You can't just give the two things the same UI without frustrating a lot of people.
(Log in to post comments)
Same interface? Posted Aug 31, 2011 17:58 UTC (Wed) by tshow (subscriber, #6411) [Link]
Top of the screen menu is also particularly lousy with multihead setups.
Same interface? Posted Aug 31, 2011 22:03 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
Quite so. Top of which screen? Sod's Law says, whichever screen you weren't using. (Not that other programs are exactly blameless in this area: you'd go green if you saw the appalling hack I'm using to make libsdl-1.2 work on my dual-monitor setup.)
|
|||||||||||||