LWN gets more valuable [LWN.net]

From:		Max.Hyre@cardiopulmonarycorp.com
To:		letters@lwn.net
Subject:		LWN gets more valuable
Date:		Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:36:42 -0400

   Dear Editors (all three of you :-):

   I was reading the comments appended to ``All SCO all the time'',
and my eye was caught by http://lwn.net/Comments/45417/, asking
that LWN continue to cover the story because it ``has by far the
best coverage of this issue''...and I had a horrible thought:
suppose you'd quit last year, and we had to rely on /.?

   While a lot of your normal (read: non-SCO) coverage would
filter into my consciousness eventually, and I'd not miss a lot
of the rest, this issue is vital, and I'd be searching for
everything I could find to learn how things are going (or not
going).

   Instead, I have it laid out neatly, cross-referenced,
interpreted, and commented on (all intelligently done) in one
convenient site. For this, you're simply indispensable. My
subscription's up next month, and I'm going to re-up at double
your suggested rate. It's worth every penny.

--

                         Best wishes,

                                  Max Hyre

(Log in to post comments)

LWN gets more valuable

Posted Aug 21, 2003 7:24 UTC (Thu) by pointwood (subscriber, #2814) [Link]

Completely agree!

LWN gets more valuable

Posted Aug 21, 2003 15:50 UTC (Thu) by joshneal (guest, #4135) [Link]

LWN's weekly edition is well worth the subscription costs by itself; the SCO coverage is a tremendous addition.

Keep up the good work.

LWN gets more valuable

Posted Aug 22, 2003 21:01 UTC (Fri) by rankincj (subscriber, #4865) [Link]

Worth every penny that I won't be paying to SCO.

LWN gets more valuable

Posted Aug 22, 2003 22:54 UTC (Fri) by tmorizot (subscriber, #1593) [Link]

I do, of course, agree. I've subscribed from shortly after you offered the option. And I will continue to do so. Your service and reporting is invaluable.