|| ||Tom Herbert <firstname.lastname@example.org> |
|| ||email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org |
|| ||[RFC PATCH v2 0/9] bql: Byte Queue Limits |
|| ||Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:43:13 -0700 (PDT)|
|| ||Article, Thread
Changes from last version:
- Simplified and generalized driver interface. Drivers need to
implement two functions:
netdev_tx_completed_queue: Called at end of transmit completion
to inform stack of number of bytes and packets processed.
netdev_tx_sent_queue: Called to inform stack when packets are
netdev_tx_reset_queue: is optional to reset state in the stack
- Added new per queue flags that allow stack to stop a queue
separately from driver doing this. Driver continue using the
same functions to stop queues, but there are two functions that
the stack calls (to check if queue has been stopped by driver or
- Added example support for bnx2x and sfc (demonstrates operation over
- Removed BQL being under CONFIG_RPS (didn't add CONFIG_BQL)
- Still needs some more testing, including ishowing benfits to high
priority packets in QoS.
This patch series implements byte queue limits (bql) for NIC TX queues.
Byte queue limits are a mechanism to limit the size of the transmit
hardware queue on a NIC by number of bytes. The goal of these byte
limits is too reduce latency caused by excessive queuing in hardware
without sacrificing throughput.
Hardware queuing limits are typically specified in terms of a number
hardware descriptors, each of which has a variable size. The variability
of the size of individual queued items can have a very wide range. For
instance with the e1000 NIC the size could range from 64 bytes to 4K
(with TSO enabled). This variability makes it next to impossible to
choose a single queue limit that prevents starvation and provides lowest
The objective of byte queue limits is to set the limit to be the
minimum needed to prevent starvation between successive transmissions to
the hardware. The latency between two transmissions can be variable in a
system. It is dependent on interrupt frequency, NAPI polling latencies,
scheduling of the queuing discipline, lock contention, etc. Therefore we
propose that byte queue limits should be dynamic and change in
iaccordance with networking stack latencies a system encounters.
Patches to implement this:
Patch 1: Dynamic queue limits (dql) library. This provides the general
Patch 2: netdev changes that use dlq to support byte queue limits.
Patch 3: Support in forcedeth drvier for byte queue limits.
The effects of BQL are demonstrated in the benchmark results below.
These were made running 200 stream of netperf RR tests:
140000 rr size
BQL: 80-215K bytes in queue, 856 tps, 3.26%
No BQL: 2700-2930K bytes in queue, 854 tps, 3.71% cpu
14000 rr size
BQ: 25-55K bytes in queue, 8500 tps
No BQL: 1500-1622K bytes in queue, 8523 tps, 4.53% cpu
1400 rr size
BQL: 20-38K in queue bytes in queue, 86582 tps, 7.38% cpu
No BQL: 29-117K 85738 tps, 7.67% cpu
140 rr size
BQL: 1-10K bytes in queue, 320540 tps, 34.6% cpu
No BQL: 1-13K bytes in queue, 323158, 37.16% cpu
1 rr size
BQL: 0-3K in queue, 338811 tps, 41.41% cpu
No BQL: 0-3K in queue, 339947 42.36% cpu
The amount of queuing in the NIC is reduced up to 90%, and I haven't
yet seen a consistent negative impact in terms of throughout or
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html