| |||||||||||
Re: SCO's proof bogus, Linux advocate says (InfoWorld)Re: SCO's proof bogus, Linux advocate says (InfoWorld)Posted Aug 20, 2003 16:19 UTC (Wed) by mmarq (guest, #2332)In reply to: Re: SCO's proof bogus, Linux advocate says (InfoWorld) by krice Parent article: SCO's proof bogus, Linux advocate says (InfoWorld) From his bakers part, IMO always seemed that SCO was to burn... (in a blaze of glory to them(bakers), if possible, of course) It is also obvious that this sliping out of evidence was not programmed, even a highly trained TECH eye could not tell much about 10 minutes of exposure to obfuscated code in a room full of journalists, specially when he was not prepared for it... If this marks the end of SCO FUD campaing, wich i doubt, than SCO masters will bury Sontag and Stowell faster than Linux/OSS can say revenge... BUT I BELIVE THEY WILL BE BACK WITH SUPPOSED "EVIDENCE" THAT HAD THE TRACKS CLEANED PREVIUOSLY,... IMO IS THEIR ONLY CHANCE. If not than is the end of SCO for sure.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||