| |||||||||||
Another point for those colaborative articles.Another point for those colaborative articles.Posted Aug 20, 2003 10:14 UTC (Wed) by marevalo (guest, #14236)Parent article: SCO's proof bogus, Linux advocate says (InfoWorld) There is a free software fan that in fact signed the NDA and was given SCO proofs of this case two months ago. He wrote and published an article in Linux Journal. From this article and the Forum presentation we can conclude that in two months they are still using the same Puffer Point presentation so probably their proofs are roughly the same but now instead of talking about 20 points where the code has been copied they are talking about a million source code lines stolen. What is really amazing is that the stock hasn't plundered ... yet.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||