| |||||||||||||
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IXPoettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IXPosted Jul 20, 2011 19:35 UTC (Wed) by SEJeff (subscriber, #51588)In reply to: Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX by Cyberax Parent article: Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX
Perhaps or perhaps not. As a 'nix admin / systems engineer, FHS is one of the best things that Linux has going for it. Other than very minimal stuff like /etc/default vs /etc/sysconfig, the FHS keeps things on Linux very consistent.
It would be sad to see things move away from this even if the idea is great.
/usr/ucb or /etc/ping anyone?
(Log in to post comments)
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 20, 2011 19:40 UTC (Wed) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]
FHS was mostly an ex-post-facto standard. That's why it works :)
Other attempts such as LSB are much less successful.
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 20, 2011 19:46 UTC (Wed) by SEJeff (subscriber, #51588) [Link]
Fair enough, you and I agree.
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 29, 2011 3:57 UTC (Fri) by Wol (guest, #4433) [Link]
LSB is an ex-post-facto standard too.
Problem is, there's much less post-facto to ex-standard on.
Cheers,
|
|||||||||||||