| |||||||||||||
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IXPoettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IXPosted Jul 20, 2011 12:13 UTC (Wed) by zuki (subscriber, #41808)In reply to: Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX by nye Parent article: Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Almost quite right, but not exactly... You are replying to a four page essay on why /etc/default/ and /etc/sysconfig have outlived their usefulness. In there the current situation is described accurately, proposed changes are explained in detail, the advantages are made clear, there's even an implementation so we know that things indeed can work the new way. So, what is the technical issue with the proposed changes?
(Log in to post comments)
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 20, 2011 12:39 UTC (Wed) by nye (guest, #51576) [Link]
>You are replying to a four page essay on why /etc/default/ and /etc/sysconfig have outlived their usefulness
No, I'm replying to 'the criticism of systemd', as I quoted.
>So, what is the technical issue with the proposed changes?
For a recent example of constructive discussion with meaningful technical content, see the ongoing thread on debian-devel titled 'A few observations about systemd'.
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 20, 2011 12:46 UTC (Wed) by nye (guest, #51576) [Link]
>For a recent example of constructive discussion with meaningful technical content
Okay, that thread does seem to have degenerated since I last checked on it :(.
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 20, 2011 20:55 UTC (Wed) by tuna (guest, #44480) [Link]
Could you provide a link?
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part IX Posted Jul 20, 2011 21:40 UTC (Wed) by zuki (subscriber, #41808) [Link]
I too think that the thread is fairly interesting, at least the first 100 messages...
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/...
|
|||||||||||||