LWN.net Logo

Reactive vs. pro-active kernel security

Reactive vs. pro-active kernel security

Posted Jul 18, 2011 8:03 UTC (Mon) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
In reply to: Reactive vs. pro-active kernel security by gmaxwell
Parent article: Reactive vs. pro-active kernel security

actually, most of the protections we are talking about adding here are not really relevant to the firewall/jump box type of application. In those applications you severely limit what code you run on the box and test it extensively. these types of protections are mostly aimed at protecting the systems after you allow untrusted people to run arbitrary code on it.

there really are not that many situations where you do that.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds