| |||||||||||||
It seems we do have a real copyright/license violation thenIt seems we do have a real copyright/license violation thenPosted Aug 19, 2003 17:55 UTC (Tue) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)In reply to: Why SCO won't show the code by BrucePerens Parent article: Why SCO won't show the code
Then it appears that Linux does have a problem that must be corrected. There is no Caldera copyright notice in the Linux copy of the code, and the license described in the letter includes the GPL-incompatible advertising clause.
(Log in to post comments)
It seems we do have a real copyright/license violation then Posted Aug 19, 2003 18:05 UTC (Tue) by hch (guest, #5625) [Link] Well, that whole file already is gone from Linux for some time(a month or two). Removed due to severe crappieness...
|
|||||||||||||