Maybe I've read it too fast, but I don't find an answer to the fundamental question: how this anti-theft system avoids being deactivated by the thief?
From the point of view of the thief, this software is a trojan, and so the very first thing that (s)he has to do is disable it: if such only requires rm-ing some bash scripts it's a way too easy.
It's also true that, before issuing 1. and 2., the system is up and running, and so there is a small window of opportunity for Prey to call the target domain and downloading instructions (if there is some network connectivity, and it's a big if) but it's not bullet-proof; so it seems to me that some kind of obfuscating executables is worth of; am I missing something?
Prey: Open source theft recovery
Posted Jul 7, 2011 19:55 UTC (Thu) by n8willis (editor, #43041)
[Link]
That's precisely why Prey takes pains to educate people on the value of disk encryption, password-protected BIOS, and other security measures.
Nate
Prey: Open source theft recovery
Posted Jul 8, 2011 7:55 UTC (Fri) by pcampe (guest, #28223)
[Link]
If the hard disk is encrypted, the system won't boot without a legitimate password (that should be in the exclusive knowledge of the owner) and so the phone home anti-theft system won't start.
Prey: Open source theft recovery
Posted Jul 8, 2011 15:16 UTC (Fri) by n8willis (editor, #43041)
[Link]
You seem to fundamentally misunderstand what Prey, Adeona, and the proprietary offerings actually are. They are not anti-theft systems.