| |||||||||||||
PCIe, power management, and problematic BIOSesPCIe, power management, and problematic BIOSesPosted Jun 30, 2011 17:24 UTC (Thu) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)In reply to: PCIe, power management, and problematic BIOSes by iceblink Parent article: PCIe, power management, and problematic BIOSes
Did anyone test that ASPM actually ended up enabled as a result? You're right that the check should be made conditional on the FADT version, though.
(Log in to post comments)
PCIe, power management, and problematic BIOSes Posted Jul 2, 2011 2:05 UTC (Sat) by iceblink (subscriber, #19982) [Link]
Yeah we noticed a spike in power testing and ended up with a DMI workaround until BIOS updates can be rolled out: http://crosbug.com/15124
PCIe, power management, and problematic BIOSes Posted Jul 2, 2011 3:05 UTC (Sat) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
Ah, ok, I hadn't realised this was Chrome OS. My concern is more that BIOS vendors in general have this opinion, and Windows handles it differently to us in some way.
|
|||||||||||||