Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for December 5, 2013
Deadline scheduling: coming soon?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 27, 2013
ACPI for ARM?
LWN.net Weekly Edition for November 21, 2013
Zeuthen: Writing a C library, part 2
Posted Jun 29, 2011 21:10 UTC (Wed) by hmh (subscriber, #3838)
You don't need to go to the lengths that glibc does (which is to actually keep compatibility to earlier ABIs by providing differently versioned versions of the same symbol :p). What you have to do is really track ABI changes properly, change your SONAME every time the ABI changes in an incompatible way, and version every linker-visible symbol with the library name and soname. You could do better than that (like glibc does), but it is not strictly necessary in most cases.
The reason is the usual app A uses lib B and lib C, and lib B also uses lib C. App A was built against lib C ABI 1, lib B ABI 2. lib C got upgraded to abi 2, lib B got rebuilt against it, and now App A needs both lib C abi 1 and lib C abi 2 to be able to run -- instant meltdown.
This happens all the time, and it makes life HELL for distros. An extremely good example of a library that breaks the world rather easily when its symbols are not versioned is libdb.
And you will want to use the linker symbol versioning instead of static versioning, otherwise, you'd break the API all the time. BTW, it is not a gcc thing, it is an ELF thing, and Solaris has been doing it since forever.
I just wish it was easier to do symbol versioning.
Posted Jul 3, 2011 6:30 UTC (Sun) by cmccabe (guest, #60281)
> Ulrich Drepper and Eric Youngdale introduced a much more sophisticated
> symbol versioning scheme, which is used by the glibc, the GNU linker, and
> gold. The key differences are that versions may be specified in object
> files and that shared libraries may contain multiple independent versions
> of the same symbol
In other words, this is a gcc-specific ELF extension. I wonder if LLVM supports it yet? I found a page from 2008 that said that LLVM didn't have support for this yet, but then I got tired of using the Google.
Posted Jul 3, 2011 9:39 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
Posted Jul 3, 2011 17:07 UTC (Sun) by paulj (subscriber, #341)
Posted Jul 6, 2011 15:54 UTC (Wed) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262)
It's not gcc-specific, it's done by GNU binutils not gcc
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds