|| ||Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh-AT-redhat.com> |
|| ||Development discussions related to Fedora <devel-AT-lists.fedoraproject.org> |
|| ||Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora |
|| ||Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:32:50 -0400|
|| ||Article, Thread
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/22/2011 04:57 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> I'm curious to know the use case(s) for this technology.
> Does it enable certain types of behaviour that aren't possible currently?
> Would it enable a system running Fedora to interact with other systems
> with a greater guarantee about its behaviour or function?
> Is it just something that system integrators would see as a feature
> enabling them to make a secured system (ie something useful for RHEL)?
> If it just allows you to optionally run a signed kernel, I don't
> understand the point if it can be circumvented by choosing to run an
> unsigned one. So I think there must be some benefit that isn't
> obvious. What's the benefit?
The idea is to allow certain tools/machines to make judgments on how
"trusted" a machine is. For example you could set up a VPN server that
says I will only allow a machine that passes the "Trusted" test to join
my network. Another potential example would be to not allow a guest
machine to run on your host if its OS is not "Trusted" Or to have a
guest OS check to see if the Host Server is Trusted or stop running.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
devel mailing list
to post comments)