| |||||||||||||
libc and javalibc and javaPosted Jun 8, 2011 12:38 UTC (Wed) by cate (subscriber, #1359)In reply to: libc and java by jonabbey Parent article: Android, forking, and control
Microsoft was suited for trademark violation with J++, so not including the "Java" keyword is not enough as long you tell user that it is like java.
(Log in to post comments)
libc and java Posted Jun 8, 2011 17:46 UTC (Wed) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link]
Sun v Microsoft came about because Microsoft licenced Java from Sun and had a contractual obligation to implement Java faithfully, as well as trademark infringement because Microsoft *were* calling their broken version Java.
|
|||||||||||||