The BSD userland is horrible IMO. The kernel, not so much. It lags behind Linux when it comes down to drivers, but for what it DOES support, it is sometimes superior.
So yes, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is actually very nice. When it works with all your hardware.
And one would have to ask people to compare Debian GNU/kFreeBSD with straight FreeBSD to know whether they prefer the GNUish/Linuxish userland or the BSDish userland, and compare Debian GNU/Linux with Debian GNU/kFreeBSD to know whether they prefer the Linux or FreeBSD kernel.
PS: "GNU/" prefix added because that's how we call these ports officially in Debian.
Posted Jun 1, 2011 14:46 UTC (Wed) by Pawlerson (guest, #74136)
[Link]
"The BSD userland is horrible IMO. The kernel, not so much. It lags behind Linux when it comes down to drivers, but for what it DOES support, it is sometimes superior."
I hope you didn't mean superior to Linux, because it lags behind in many other areas today. :)
"So yes, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is actually very nice. When it works with all your hardware."
GNU userland makes a huge difference. I prefer to use APT rather than bsd ports. Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is much more appealing than FreeBSD and there's a much newer GCC, right?