Posted May 23, 2011 20:49 UTC (Mon) by kragil (guest, #34373)
In reply to: 2.8.0? by yoshi314
Parent article: 2.8.0?
They had enough time to prepare .. it is not like this discussion is new.
And anyways most stuff is FOSS and can be changed. If no breakage would be a valid argument we would end up with 2.6.2323.47 which is just pathetic.
What I would like to see is a "stable" versioning algorithm.