| |||||||||||||
No MetricsNo MetricsPosted May 19, 2011 18:40 UTC (Thu) by oelewapperke (guest, #74309)In reply to: No Metrics by raven667 Parent article: Scale Fail (part 1)
That's because it requires the "end" party to take the initiative. That's the beauty of NAT. Put an ancient totally unsupported bug-riddled system that every grandmother knows how to exploit remotely behind a nat firewall ...
And it's perfectly secure.
(Log in to post comments)
No Metrics Posted May 23, 2011 4:24 UTC (Mon) by RobertBrockway (guest, #48927) [Link]
No it isn't. If that was true then most successful attacks today wouldn't even occur. For some time now the bulk of attacks have occurred over connections initiated by the end user system.
|
|||||||||||||