| |||||||||||||
MySQL, Postgres and copyright assignmentMySQL, Postgres and copyright assignmentPosted May 18, 2011 15:02 UTC (Wed) by dkg (subscriber, #55359)In reply to: Mark Shuttleworth on companies and free software by tajyrink Parent article: Mark Shuttleworth on companies and free software Yep. MySQL used copyright assignment to build a company and employ people. Other people used different employment strategies and no copyright assignment to build a community around Postgres. Because of the centralized control of the copyright for MySQL, the project was bought outright by a proprietary competitor. The MySQL community now seems to be in disarray. The Postgres community seems to be moving happily forward together. At this point, i'd rather rely on the Postgres community (though i confess i like the Postgres RDBMS itself better than i like the MySQL RDBMS, so my technical inclinations may also be coloring my perceptions).
(Log in to post comments)
MySQL, Postgres and copyright assignment Posted May 19, 2011 17:48 UTC (Thu) by sorpigal (subscriber, #36106) [Link]
This is a good point. From the view of most of the world it seems like having a company behind a program makes it reliable, but from a free software point of view having no single owner improves reliability far more. The MySQL example is quite instructive in this regard.
MySQL, Postgres and copyright assignment Posted May 19, 2011 18:00 UTC (Thu) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198) [Link]
If MySQL represents the worst case scenario where a central copyright codebase gets bought out by a potentially hostile competitor then I'm not sure how bad that really is given that there are several active forks that look promising right now and the main vendor is still supporting and releasing new versions.
|
|||||||||||||