| |||||||||||||
"Red Hat responded by filing a preemptive suit""Red Hat responded by filing a preemptive suit"Posted Apr 25, 2011 23:28 UTC (Mon) by cesarb (subscriber, #6266)Parent article: A victory for the trolls
This is a sentence where I would have expected a link. Is there more information about RedHat's preemptive suit anywhere?
(Log in to post comments)
"Red Hat responded by filing a preemptive suit" Posted Apr 26, 2011 4:53 UTC (Tue) by FlorianMueller (guest, #32048) [Link]
Red Hat's suit was reactive, not pre-emptive. The case number is 6:09-cv-00549, same court (Eastern District of Texas), but justia.com refers to PACER.gov for access to the documents. I downloaded some of the filings.
|
|||||||||||||