Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part VIIIPoettering: systemd for Administrators, Part VIIIPosted Apr 22, 2011 0:40 UTC (Fri) by wahern (subscriber, #37304)In reply to: Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part VIII by HelloWorld Parent article: Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part VIII
Adhere to POSIX shell syntax and semantics so that it can be a drop-in replacement for existing shell scripts.
The shell mirrors the Unix process model very closely, and few other languages do that. That's what makes it useful. The closest example I can think of is Tcl, but it's no more POSIX-shell compatible than any other language.
(Log in to post comments)
Poettering: systemd for Administrators, Part VIII Posted Apr 22, 2011 3:21 UTC (Fri) by HelloWorld (guest, #56129) [Link]
> Adhere to POSIX shell syntax and semantics so that it can be a drop-in replacement for existing shell scripts.
In that case, I'm not even remotely interested. The traditional Unix Shell model is utterly broken by design, and it's impossible to fix it without incompatible changes.
|
|||||||||||||