LWN.net Logo

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

By Jonathan Corbet
April 19, 2011
The best presents are often those which are totally unexpected; thus, your editor was doubly pleased to find a box from Google on the front step with a Motorola Xoom tablet inside. The Xoom is one of the first full-size Android tablets on the market; it is also one of the few to run the elusive "Honeycomb" Android release. One of the best ways to justify playing with new toys is to find a way to call it work; thus, here is a review of the device and how Android is shaping up on tablets in general.

The Xoom, at 730 grams, is surprisingly heavy; much of that weight seems to be a battery which, it is claimed, can support "up to 10 hours" of video playback time or over three days of audio playback. It features a 1200x800 screen, a 1GHz dual-core processor, 32GB of internal storage, cameras on the front and back, two speakers, and an HDMI port. The power button is cleverly hidden on the back; your editor has seen a few people struggle to find it. Two volume buttons on the side are the only other physical buttons on the device. There is a cellular interface, but it is tied to Verizon's CDMA network; happily, the device is happy to operate in a WiFi-only mode.

[Barometer HD] Each new gadget seems to come with a new sensor; your editor approves of this trend wholeheartedly. The Xoom, as it turns out, has a barometer built into it. Few applications make use of it at this point. Sadly, the leading barometer application seems to be "Barometer HD," which was evidently written under the impression that the device would never be subject to less than 950 millibars of pressure (or would never be operated above sea level). Your editor, whose home is currently at 827 millibars, will get little use from this application.

Android on tablets

The Android developers have evidently been working flat-out to create a version of the distribution which is well suited to tablets. The result generally works well, but it is clearly a work in progress that will require some adjustment from people who are used to the handset version of Android. To begin, the traditional four buttons (home, back, menu, and search) found on handsets are not present on the Xoom. The lower left of the screen often (but not always) contains replacements for some of those buttons:

[Xoom
buttons]

The home and back buttons are usually there, at least. Sometimes one will see a strange grid pattern (on the right, above) that turns out to be the menu button - except when a different menu button (more like the version seen on handsets) appears in the upper right corner instead; that is an inconsistency that is likely to create some confusion.

One other button often found in the lower left is a pair of overlapping rectangles. That button turns out to be the way to switch between running [App switcher] applications; it presents a row of thumbnail screenshots which, by all appearances, has been strongly influenced by the MeeGo "zones" mechanism. Tapping on a thumbnail, naturally, switches to the corresponding application. Annoyingly, a maximum of five applications (eight in portrait mode) can appear in this list. On the Xoom, the "long tap on home" reflex that most Android users pick up eventually is no longer useful; the interface designers have used some of the extra screen space to move that functionality to its own button instead.

Many other parts of the interface have not yet caught up to the fact that there is a lot more screen space available, though. Only allowing a single application to be on the screen at a time makes great sense on a handset; there simply is not room for more. But the tablet's resolution is comparable to that of the workstations your editor used for years; there could be value in having a calculator on-screen with a mail client, or a messaging client together with a browser. MeeGo allows this kind of sharing of the screen; Android, at this point, does not.

Quite a few of the applications have also not caught up to the idea that they have some room to play with; this is, perhaps unsurprisingly, more true of add-on applications from the market than the built-in applications from Google. The K9 mail client will use the full screen for the message list, or to display a single message, but it cannot do both at the same time; a quick check shows that the Gmail client is a bit smarter that way. Calculators spread themselves across the entire screen to the point that using them requires significant arm movement; perhaps this can be seen as a different type of feature bloat. One welcome change is that the browser has made room for a tab bar; the "window" concept from the handset version appears to be gone.

The on-screen keyboard has, naturally, expanded to fill the available space; that makes it easier to deal with, but does not change the fact that [Keyboard] soft keyboards are a pain for any sort of serious typing. The keyboard seems to have regressed a bit from the version found on Gingerbread-based handsets; in particular, the ability to type numbers with a long keypress on a top-row key is gone. One could explain that change by saying that the tablet interface appears to be moving away from the "long touch" interaction mode in general, but some other characters are still available that way. Some features (switching languages, for example) have moved to their own buttons below the keyboard.

Notifications no longer appear at the top of the display; instead, they cluster in the bottom right corner. Tapping on the clock (which is also in that corner) yields a list of notifications; sadly, there is no "clear" button, so notifications must be dismissed one at a time. This corner also replaces the root-screen menu found on handsets; the system settings menus are found here, for example. It is also used to lock the screen orientation (nice when setting the device flat on a table) and the display brightness. Notifications can be disabled altogether; this feature is not available on handsets.

The tablet format, as a whole, represents a new and interesting way of dealing with computers; one suspects that we have not yet begun to figure out how we can make the best use of these devices. Your editor was not sold on the format, but, it must be said, tablets make a nice way of reading online content or scanning mail from an armchair. A tablet on the dining-room table (which is where the Xoom is likely to end up) is handy for checking the news and such. For longer (book-length) reading a device with an electronic ink display (or a real book) is still preferable. Any task involving real typing needs a real keyboard. For everything else, the tablet is a nice device to have.

Hackability

One of Android's best features is that a fair number of the devices out there allow (intentionally or otherwise) a relatively high level of user access. The list of devices supported by CyanogenMod is eye-opening. So, when a device like the Xoom wanders in the door, it is natural to wonder how open it is. The answer is that it is too soon to say, but there are some encouraging indications.

To begin with, rooting the device requires nothing special. The Xoom has not been locked down by Motorola, so a simple:

    fastboot oem unlock

command works with no further fuss required. One of the first things developers have done with this access is to produce a replacement kernel which allows overclocking, adds the TUN module for OpenVPN support, and, nicely, enables the SD card slot which is not usable (pending "a future software update") with the stock Xoom distribution.

There do not appear to be any full replacement distributions available for the Xoom yet; in any case, proper, built-from-source replacements will not be possible until Google sees fit to release the Honeycomb source. That will, sadly, delay the availability of distributions like CyanogenMod indefinitely. This delay can only serve to reduce the level of developer excitement around Android-based tablet devices.

But what alternatives are there? It's worth pointing out that MeeGo still exists, and that, someday, somebody may actually release a mainstream tablet device based on it. MeeGo could have some advantages on this format; it is more like a traditional operating system, which may make sense on a device that can behave more like a traditional computer. If somebody can get devices out there sometime soon (that seems to be a big "if" with MeeGo), they might just go somewhere. The upcoming tablet based on WebOS also bears watching for a number of the same reasons. Android for tablets is nice, but it is far from finished, and it has not, yet, taken over this segment. There is an opportunity here; it will be interesting to see who grabs it.


(Log in to post comments)

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 15:20 UTC (Tue) by oever (subscriber, #987) [Link]

Android really makes me feel out of control. I have Galaxy Tab and to me it is a hostile device. I cannot determine what it is doing. There's a microphone and camera in there and for all I know it is recording everything around it and sending it to some third party.

Sadly, I cannot find an easy way to put another software stack/distribution on it. Hopefully this will change at some point. Ideally I would put a mix of KDE Active, MeeGo and a fully FOSS version of Android on there.

Android really has a lot of potential, but like KDE Active (linux in general) and MeeGo, there are not enough options to lock down 3rd party applications with regard to what type of communication to what servers is allowed, what hardware access, and how much memory or CPU is permitted.

Nevertheless, I use the tab a bit, but it does not feel good.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 15:56 UTC (Tue) by mcoleman (guest, #70990) [Link]

Second this, regarding user hardware control. It's difficult to trust a device that doesn't have *hard* switches to disable all of the "wireless" features (built-in cameras, microphones, radios). A hard switch for the speakers is important, too, especially for a device you cannot easily remove the battery from (which is my current hard switch of last resort).

(In a somewhat related trend, it's almost impossible now to get flash drives and hard drives with a hard read-only switch. Every time you plug one of these in, you are completely trusting the hardware you plug it into.)

The Xoom itself looks attractive at $450, but at the current price it's a no-go. I'm using a rooted Color Nook instead, which is pretty nice, and at seven inches probably about as large as I'd care to go.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 16:23 UTC (Tue) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]

How is the rooted Nook color? I'm thinking about one; the price tag is about the upper end of being possible for me to afford at the moment. I played with one a little bit, but I'd love to hear your take on it.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 1:42 UTC (Wed) by tutufan (guest, #60063) [Link]

Well, I'm enjoying it, but my expectations were quite low. Read the reviews and look at the videos closely--that will help.

For me it works reasonably well, though the interface is a bit quirky, and occasionally having only one hard button (instead of four) is an inconvenience. Though it's not heavy, I can't really hold it comfortably with one hand, which was a bit of a surprise. Having used this seven-inch device, I can't really imagine wanting to deal with anything larger. If anything, I'd be tempted to go with *smaller* devices in the future. (In some ways, my (work) Blackberry is easier to use, as it can be used one-handed.)

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 2:38 UTC (Wed) by alogghe (subscriber, #6661) [Link]

A rooted Nook Color is generally excellent.

The screen is 1024x600 and its 380grams instead of the too heavy 630gram+ of the iPad and wannabees. Most of the eink devices are 250grams I believe.

Beautiful screen.

Snappy and responsive ui. Enough acceleration to make it pleasant to browser and read.

Cyanogen has a replace softkey setup to make up for the lack of a back and menu button on the hardware. Its quite nice.

Firefox mobile is a good to great experience on it.

Highly recommended.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 18:07 UTC (Wed) by khc (subscriber, #45209) [Link]

Has cyanogen fixed the sleep power consumption problem and video problem yet? I was going to flash to cyanogen but stopped after reading about them.

Nook Color & CyanogenMod

Posted Apr 21, 2011 0:14 UTC (Thu) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]

They have fixed the video problem. You still need to encode to whatever the chip supports (until they get the closed drivers working on the NC that allow full resolution). But that's the same as before CM.

I think the sleep power consumption problem is not fixed. However, I have had no trouble with the battery life of my Nook Color running CM 7 release. It is snappy, pretty, and the soft-button bar at the bottom works really well. It may no go to the lowest sleep state, but at whatever state it goes to, it still lasts for days without a charge. Remember that the screen sucks down tons of power... so if that sucker is off then it doesn't drain that much power.

Nook Color & CyanogenMod

Posted Apr 21, 2011 21:12 UTC (Thu) by khc (subscriber, #45209) [Link]

I don't encode much video myself actually, as long as youtube works I am happy.

If it lasts for days without a charge, I may give it a try. I was reading that it needs charging everyday. I already do that for my phone, I don't want to remember to recharge another device everyday.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 4:00 UTC (Wed) by ncm (subscriber, #165) [Link]

Seems to be about $200 for B/W, $300 for color.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 4:04 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]

The black and white (eink) and colour Nooks are entirely different devices. The eink device is pretty special purpose - people have written applications for it, but they're incredibly limited by the hardware constraints and there's no terribly useful way to run unmodified Android applications. The Color has a much more capable CPU and a full touchscreen, so it's entirely capable of running a full Android tablet setup.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 20:12 UTC (Tue) by smoogen (subscriber, #97) [Link]

Sadly the days of hardware switches that actually do anything seem to be far behind us. I remember at least back in 2006 we were evaluating some hardware with supposed switches but all they did was tell the software to turn stuff off and could be bypassed.

Sadly the days of the US government ordering them for security reasons seems to be done with as it violates various "off the shelf, lower costs" mantras.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 21, 2011 19:30 UTC (Thu) by cwillu (subscriber, #67268) [Link]

An SD card's readonly tab is typically implemented in software. If you don't trust the software, you can't trust the readonly tab.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 15:42 UTC (Tue) by rfunk (subscriber, #4054) [Link]

"There do not appear to be any full replacement distributions available for the Xoom yet; in any case, proper, built-from-source replacements will not be possible until Google sees fit to release the Honeycomb source. That will, sadly, delay the availability of distributions like CyanogenMod indefinitely."

Shouldn't it be possible to port the Gingerbread-based CyanogenMod 7 to the Xoom? If you don't have the source to Honeycomb, use the source you do have....

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 16:04 UTC (Tue) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582) [Link]

Curiously, I received my first Android tablet a week ago, the Notion Ink Adam (but it wasn't a free gift: I ordered it). I haven't previously used Android. This tablet runs a customised froyo, not honeycomb, and has the traditional four buttons. I am happy to have those buttons, because the touchscreen occasionally goes dysfunctional: it seems to be because of ill-behaved apps (after I removed Firefox it behaves much better). In fact, after your description of honeycomb, I doubt I'll update even if Notion Ink offers it. I'll hold out for some form of linux (there is already an early port of Ubuntu).

(My review of the Adam is here, in case anyone is interested in this device.)

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 18:01 UTC (Tue) by dowdle (subscriber, #659) [Link]

Nice review Jon... BUT you guys at LWN really need to get with the times... and actually try some video reviews. See this one of the recently released ASUS eee Pad Transformer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvxth_Sxfps

For all of you who watch that and drool... it isn't available in the US yet. I'd be happier with a stock Linux distro and would ditch Android in a heartbeat... but then again... Linux distros have a little ways to go in the touchscreen area... but Canonical and others will change that real soon now.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 18:12 UTC (Tue) by Trelane (subscriber, #56877) [Link]

...until MSFT pays them off again to discard linux. :(

--sour former eee fan.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 19:26 UTC (Tue) by sailorxyz (subscriber, #52650) [Link]

I am totally deaf. I hope LWN never goes into video reviews. This video thing as it currently is, is slowly destroying a lot of the value of the Internet for people who are deaf (not to mention the blind but at least most of them can hear, so they still get the dialog and so some value) if every video article had a transcript attached, then they would be truly useful but as things are, I cannot help but hate them.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 20:20 UTC (Tue) by dowdle (subscriber, #659) [Link]

Just to clarify:

1) Written reviews can still be done (I don't want them stopped) but video reviews can augment them in a good way

2) Text captioning can be added to videos for the audio impaired

3) Blind people can't see text or video... so they want audio anyway... and a video can provide the audio in addition to a screen reader

For this particular review, of a hardware device... showing the physical buttons and the items on screen in a video makes it so much more crystal clear. I'd certainly not want to see a video report of the latest kernel function on the kernel page. :)

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 20:27 UTC (Tue) by lambda (subscriber, #40735) [Link]

I am neither blind nor deaf, and I hate video reviews, or when people link to a talk on a subject instead of a paper. It is a lot slower listening to someone talk than it is to read, I can't skip around easily, I can't search it, I need to find a pair of headphones so I don't bother anyone who's around me, and I frequently need to enable Flash in order to watch them.

Now, there some cases in which a video is more valuable than a text review; if you're showing off some kind of physical interaction, a video can sometimes get your point across much more easily than a paragraph of text describing what's going on. But on the whole, I'm in favor of keeping more information in a text format; it's more accessible, even to those without any disabilities.

Video reviews?

Posted Apr 19, 2011 21:52 UTC (Tue) by dowdle (subscriber, #659) [Link]

I don't know if you visit the gaming site IGN but they typically offer written reviews for everything and augment the more popular games with a video review. The video reviews are always shorter and they say for more in-depth coverage, read the written review. Games are very visual so seeing it in action helps out a lot and really enhances the written review.

For me and this review... having Jon describe the buttons and where they are on the screen... and how they operate, especially when he was throwing in Android phone references too (and I don't have one of those either)... a video of it in action would do a much better job. But yeah, save the in-depth stuff for the written review.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 22:01 UTC (Tue) by linuxjacques (subscriber, #45768) [Link]

Please DO NOT go down the video review path.

Many sites are useless to me now because I am blocked from streaming video at work.

Also, I would rather read and look at pictures than watch a video of a guy saying "Um" about 100 times.

Video reviews are the road to hell. Can't write / spell / use proper grammar / organize your thoughts logically?

No problem! Just start the video camera.

No thanks.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 22:13 UTC (Tue) by a9db0 (subscriber, #2181) [Link]

Seconded.

While I've seen Jon speak, and seen videos of his talks and have no doubt that he would be able to carry videos off intelligently, I still vote against them.

They make surfing difficult in quiet environments. They require more bandwith. They require shutting off other audio. And they are rarely worth the effort.

LWN is a joy because it has a simple, text based layout that loads quickly and presents information clearly. No Javascript, AJAX, or any of that nonsense that makes so many other sites (Gawker, I'm looking at you) so annoying to use.

Video reviews

Posted Apr 19, 2011 22:18 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link]

We don't really have time to create the content we put out now; I can't imagine how we'd try to put video production into the mix. So I don't think there's any threat of us going in that direction anytime soon.

Video reviews

Posted Apr 19, 2011 23:11 UTC (Tue) by dowdle (subscriber, #659) [Link]

Screw those guys... conform to my wishes now Jon!!!

(waves wand)

Hmmm... it didn't work. I guess I have to wait for wand 2.0 to come out.

Regarding video reviews, I say watch a few on IGN or gt.tv. Their video reviews are very high production value and missing the umms and other flaws those guys are groaning about. They are scripted. Of course they are video game reviews and you might not be interested in that, but hey, they are the best example I could think of.

But really... a video for special stuff would be a bonus!

I post lots of videos on my website... mostly from talks I didn't get to go to. Some are screencasts I made myself... and they rule... so don't me otherwise. I won't listen. (sticking fingers in ears)... la la la la... la la la la.

I also enjoy brianmadden.com's video work... Brian Madden TV... and their vendor interviews.

For you guys to say that "video sucks and is for stupid people" and "written reviews are the only way"... yeah, it gets Jon off the hook. :) Brown nosers!

Video reviews

Posted Apr 21, 2011 10:17 UTC (Thu) by farnz (guest, #17727) [Link]

I've gone and looked at IGN's Portal 2 for XBox 360 video review, and frankly, it's convinced me that video reviews are not the way to go.

It's not production values - the production values on the Portal 2 review are high. It's the sheer amount of time I spent watching it, compared to the amount of information conveyed; I'm a fast reader, so this article took me about a minute to read and digest. The IGN video was nearly 5 minutes long, and didn't convey as much about how the game feels to play (as compared to how it looks and sounds) as this article conveys about the daily experience of using a Xoom.

Basically, I'm not interested in a review telling me how it looks - the manufacturer will do that for me quite happily, or I can choose to spend the extra money and buy from a bricks and mortar store that lets me fiddle first. I want a review that tells me whether I'm likely to find a use for it, what the niggles are (so that I can check if they'd annoy me before I bought it), and generally give me an impression of what it's like long-term, not how pretty it is.

Video reviews

Posted Apr 21, 2011 15:15 UTC (Thu) by cdmiller (subscriber, #2813) [Link]

Video replacing reading? Fahrenheit 451 much?

Video reviews

Posted Apr 20, 2011 5:20 UTC (Wed) by avik (guest, #704) [Link]

What we really want are video comments (replacing the existing system)

Video reviews

Posted Apr 20, 2011 6:56 UTC (Wed) by elanthis (guest, #6227) [Link]

But that means I'd have to put clothes on before commenting on LWN! :(

Video reviews

Posted Apr 21, 2011 20:13 UTC (Thu) by rahvin (subscriber, #16953) [Link]

I can imagine how you would do it. Just like the other sites and as previously alluded to, you would sit down, turn the camera on and start talking without a script. After a few hundred ums and 5 minutes of video you end and post the video without post processing it.

Video is the death of intelligent articles. It's a bane imposed by those with short attention spans. Not that my vote counts but don't go down that path please.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 21:46 UTC (Tue) by boog (subscriber, #30882) [Link]

Second those who like their information in text. Quicker, more effective and quiet.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 0:09 UTC (Wed) by cmccabe (guest, #60281) [Link]

I'm not a big fan of video reviews of products.

When I look at a product review, I often want to skim it. I may only care if the Foo has feature Bar, but not want to hear about the rest of it. LWN's reviews are pretty good and I usually read the whole thing. But still, some days I have more time than others. That time may also come in small chunks while waiting for something to compile or finish. With a video, I have to listen to the whole thing.

What if I want use Google to search for a product review? Google is pretty good at searching text, but can't search video at all.

If there's some aspect of the product that really is best described by a video, then sure, it's nice to see a video. Having the whole thing be a video is like having the whole thing be a giant picture. At the end of the day, text is still the best at doing the things that text can do.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 19, 2011 20:33 UTC (Tue) by boudewijn (subscriber, #14185) [Link]

Depending on where you live and your definition of mainstream, a MeeGo tablet device has been out since fall 2010. That is, in Germany and the Netherlands, the Wetab has been available through the Mediamarkt consumer electronics chain, which is pretty mainstream. Last fall, the hardware was better than the software, these days it's a bit the other way around. Still, it's MeeGo, it's hackable, it's usable. And Intel's tablet ux for MeeGo is shaping up nicely. One daughter of mine hated it, but the other thought it was pretty nifty already. The third wasn't interested in tablets at all...

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 17:42 UTC (Wed) by sciurus (subscriber, #58832) [Link]

At 11.6 inches, 2.21 pounds, and a 2 to 6 hour battery life, I don't think the WeTab is really a comparable device to something like the Xoom or Nook Color.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 0:20 UTC (Wed) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359) [Link]

> On the Xoom, the "long tap on home" reflex that most Android users pick up eventually is no longer useful;

So for those of use who have never used an Android ... what was it once useful for?

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 0:26 UTC (Wed) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link]

Think of a long tap (holding your finger in the same place for about a second, essentially) as being like a click with the right mouse button. Touchpads can't (yet) tell fingers apart, so the interface uses a long tap as a way to get a different response out of the element you've put your finger on.

For example, on Android phones, tapping the "home" button returns to the home screen. A long tap on that button will, instead, put up a list of running applications and let you choose one to switch to.

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 1:22 UTC (Wed) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

In my experience, this isn't the exact requirement for making it into the list. Apps which get launched from other apps don't get inserted into the list (e.g., Youtube launched from the browser). It seems to only be applications launched from the home screen/application drawer. Granted, I'm now using LauncherPro, but I remember this being the case with the HTC default as well.

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 6:16 UTC (Wed) by KSteffensen (subscriber, #68295) [Link]

Youtube is not an app, it's content being shown in the browser.

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 11:09 UTC (Wed) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

I actually have a YouTube application which, AFAICT using a task killer, is launched for YouTube videos (even from the browser). Same with other webvideo and the generic "Streaming Multimedia" application I have.

My biggest gripe is that you can't background it to allow it to buffer the whole video. Seeking is also very flaky (often just tossing away all of the cache and then quitting). This is the primary reason I refuse to use flash on my main machines: mplayer just does so much better at everything than flash when it comes to video.

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 7:29 UTC (Wed) by rvfh (subscriber, #31018) [Link]

Damn! 9 months working on Android and having an Android phone and I need to read LWN comments to find out about this. May be I should RTFM some day...

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 14:00 UTC (Wed) by nevyn (subscriber, #33129) [Link]

I wouldn't surprise me if this was the main reason they are moving away from the "long press" functionality. I only found out about the long press on home feature by accident, after having my phone for 6 months or so (and then it must have taken me 5-10 minutes to find out what I did to get it).

It's also kind of slow (I'd guess you have to hold the press for 2 seconds), and out of the way enough, that I rarely use it.

And I didn't know about the "long press for numbers" functionality, until I read this review.

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 15:14 UTC (Wed) by nye (guest, #51576) [Link]

>And I didn't know about the "long press for numbers" functionality, until I read this review.

Eh? Does your on-screen keyboard not show you the shifted version of each button in a lighter colour above the main button? Mine has '1' above 'Q', '!' above 'A', '_' above 'Z', etc. Trying to type on the thing would be excruciating without those.

I think this is Froyo (but maybe the keyboard is an application independent of the OS version?).

Long taps

Posted Apr 20, 2011 21:36 UTC (Wed) by edgewood (subscriber, #1123) [Link]

I discovered the "long press on home" by accident after a month or two of owning an Android phone, by being distracted into not raising my finger quickly enough to complete a regular press.

Being an analytical person, I then wondered what long taps on other buttons would do, and discovered the "long press on search to bring up voice search".

But I could see other people never discovering the difference that a long tap can make.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 8:19 UTC (Wed) by linusw (subscriber, #40300) [Link]

Given that this is one of the first nVidia Tegra based devices (dual core Cortex A9 ARM I think) and that nVidia are known for 3D performance it is a bit surprising that these things doesn't even surface in the review. Is all that extra bang worth it?

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 9:57 UTC (Wed) by etienne (subscriber, #25256) [Link]

What I would really need is a tablet which can play the HD video I am taking with my 2 year old camera, at full 1080p HD Video (60fps), 25 Mbits/sec.
It is not even amazing to see most new and "powerful" portable PC freeze the display within the first few seconds of playback with Linux/VLC, within the first second with windows - whatever the display video card - and whatever 2D or 3D accelerated (acceleration seems not useful for MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 video playback).
It seems only a new desktop PC - or the 400 GBP camera itself plugged into the TV on HDMI - can play this sort of thing.
I lately brought a tablet which they said would play full 1080p HD Video, but obviously it skips frames like mad, and if you read the docs (after opening the box) it is limited to 16 Mbits/sec.
Obviously no source available for that tablet, where half the functions described in the docs (like a working SD card slot) do not work at all.

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 10:14 UTC (Wed) by etienne (subscriber, #25256) [Link]

Sorry, video I am trying to play are 1920p, i.e. 1920 x 1080 (60 fps/ 24Mbps).

Xoom and the Android tablet experience

Posted Apr 20, 2011 11:13 UTC (Wed) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

That *is* 1080p. The number gives the number of horizontal lines, the 'i' or 'p' tells what order the lines are in. 1920p would be 3400 wide to match the 1080p ratio.

Entitled to get the source?

Posted Apr 20, 2011 15:24 UTC (Wed) by sebas (subscriber, #51660) [Link]

Hey Jon,

Aren't you entitled to get the source code to Honeycomb, since you got a tablet?

Asking for it is probably not the nicest thing to do, given that it's a "present", but certainly an interesting exercise.

Entitled to get the source?

Posted Apr 20, 2011 15:34 UTC (Wed) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link]

Since the source is not shipped with the tablet, anybody is entitled to ask for it. But that only applies to the GPL-licensed source - the kernel, essentially. Since people are already building alternative kernels for the Xoom, I assume the relevant source is already circulating, though I've not actually looked into it.

Entitled to get the source?

Posted Apr 20, 2011 17:45 UTC (Wed) by sebas (subscriber, #51660) [Link]

Ah, okay.

Thanks for the interesting review, by the way, and so many other insightful and enjoyable articles.

Entitled to get the source?

Posted Apr 20, 2011 19:48 UTC (Wed) by swetland (subscriber, #63414) [Link]

Kernel sources are available here:

http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/tegra.git;a=shortlog;...

Note that Xoom is known by the internal name, "stingray", here.

Copyright © 2011, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds