Some remaining typos

Some remaining typos

Posted Aug 11, 2003 14:26 UTC (Mon) by Antartica (guest, #13908)
Parent article: The text of IBM's counterclaims

Some typos that are still in the text:

===CUT===
NATURE OF THIS ACTION/80./wimout -> without

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES/Second Defense/...engaged m any -> engaged in any

C. IBM and Linux/19./That SCO haa distibuted -> That SCO has distributed

C. IBM and Linux/19./is entitled to me protections -> is entitled to the protections

E. SCO's Scheme/22./if not all, of me UNIX technology -> if not all, of the UNIX technology

F. SCO's Lawsuit and Threats/26./injuction tenninating IBM's -> injuction terminating IBM's
===CUT===

Note that I've stopped reading in
SECOND COUNTERCLAIM/Lanham Act Violation

So I suppose that there may be some more O:-)

Disclaimer: I've repeated some of the ones found by other users... I suppose that it will be easier to the editor if they are collected in a single comment ;-).

BTW: Very interesting read :-b

---

(Log in to post comments)