| |||||||||||||
in defense of "contributor agreements" or whatever they are called nowadaysin defense of "contributor agreements" or whatever they are called nowadaysPosted Apr 13, 2011 21:43 UTC (Wed) by zooko (subscriber, #2589)In reply to: in defense of "contributor agreements" or whatever they are called nowadays by spaetz Parent article: Project Harmony decloaks
> Why don't you just license your project under an MIT license then?
Because we didn't want (other) companies to be able to make proprietary derivatives and redistribute them. At least not without paying us.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||