LWN.net Logo

Randal: A Brief History of Harmony

Randal: A Brief History of Harmony

Posted Apr 13, 2011 12:02 UTC (Wed) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950)
Parent article: Randal: A Brief History of Harmony

I don't doubt the intention is good. Still, I think copyright assignments are bad. A lot is based on the view Michael Meeks has. Suggest to watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Olx3EvJMl0 (really good and positive explanation).

Only result of Project Harmony is to make sure the position GNOME took (was announced a while back) is clearly documented. I've checked and clarified https://live.gnome.org/ProjectPrerequisites (=a page containing requirements to be hosted on GNOME infrastructure). Someone changed it into a politcally correct version (ask the board).. but in practice: I am never going to make any effort for a _new_ module which has copyright assignments (the sysadmin bit to trust someone and give that person a Git account). This as I think it is in the best interest to not have copyright assignments.

I think the actual trend is to do away with copyright assignments. Clutter on our request and a lot of effort on the developers part to get approval for this. Evolution did away with that years ago. LibreOffice seems to really have taken off now.


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds