| |||||||||||||
a dissenting opinion: this is usefula dissenting opinion: this is usefulPosted Apr 12, 2011 14:40 UTC (Tue) by clint (subscriber, #7076)In reply to: a dissenting opinion: this is useful by zooko Parent article: Project Harmony decloaks
I'm in the same boat. Furthermore I'd advise anyone who isn't being given substantial monetary compensation for such contributions to fork the software rather than sign such an agreement.
(Log in to post comments)
a dissenting opinion: this is useful Posted Apr 12, 2011 20:03 UTC (Tue) by ballombe (subscriber, #9523) [Link]
I agree. Maybe an alternative to money would be getting voting rights in the organization that receive the agreement with each contributions and require that some actions of the organization (including relicensing) be subject to a vote with says, at least 35% quorum and 65% voters approval.
a dissenting opinion: this is useful Posted Apr 13, 2011 3:19 UTC (Wed) by zooko (subscriber, #2589) [Link]
That's an interesting idea. I wonder how people would decide how many voting rights you get for a given contribution, though? By voting, I guess! I would be interested to see someone try something like that.
|
|||||||||||||