OK, that's the last of your comments I've allowed myself to answer.
You do understand the meaning and undertones conveyed by the word «harridan», don't you? If that's acceptable language for you, you should also accept the following with grace.
See, PJ has many flaws and clearly showed bias sometimes but her reporting gave me an extremely interesting insight into the legal processes in the US. Even if (and even *when*) her *opinions* were biased, her *reporting* was very good and very well documented.
While you, sir, are just a thundering gobshite.
@lwn staff: feel free to remove this comment if you find the word «harridan» less offensive; otherwise please remove this comment *and* its parent comment.