Weekly edition	Kernel	Security	Distributions	Contact Us	Search
Archives	Calendar	Subscribe	Write for LWN	LWN.net FAQ	Sponsors

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:22 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626)
In reply to: The text of IBM's counterclaims by entre
Parent article: The text of IBM's counterclaims

Change "m" to "in"

Second Defense

SCO's claims are barred because IBM has not engaged m any unlawful
or unfair business practices, and IBM's conduct was privileged, performed
in the exercise of an absolute right, proper and/or justified.

(Log in to post comments)

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:24 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626) [Link]

Licensed typed twice

22. States that it is without information sufficient to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments of paragraph 22, except admits
that AT&T Technologies, Inc. licensed licensed certain software to
IBM and Sequent.

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:33 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626) [Link]

"without"

81. States that it is wimout information sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth of the averments of paragraph 81.

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 11, 2003 1:15 UTC (Mon) by niceguy2279 (guest, #13886) [Link]

OCR mistake?

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 11, 2003 14:10 UTC (Mon) by magician (guest, #13906) [Link]

Search for " me " (space m e space) there are, I believe, six occurances in the legal document, all of which should be "the"

Similarly search for " die " (space d i e space) there is one occurance which should also be "the".