Create an account

Subscribe to LWN

LWN.net Weekly Edition for February 9, 2012

LWN.net Weekly Edition for February 2, 2012

A tempest in a toybox

LWN.net Weekly Edition for January 26, 2012

Weekly edition	Kernel	Security	Distributions	Contact Us	Search
Archives	Calendar	Subscribe	Write for LWN	LWN.net FAQ	Sponsors

The text of IBM's counterclaims

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:02 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626)
In reply to: The text of IBM's counterclaims by uaimp
Parent article: The text of IBM's counterclaims

section / paragraph 22 change "me" to "the".
22. SCO devised a scheme to profit from the UNIX rights that it
acquired from Original SCO, though UNIX was in no way developed by SCO.
Although most, if not all, of me UNIX technology that SCO purports to
own is generally known, available without restriction to the general public
or readily ascertainable by proper means, SCO undertook to create fear,
uncertainty and doubt in the marketplace in regard to SCO's rights in and
to that technology.

(Log in to post comments)

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:22 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626) [Link]

Change "m" to "in"

Second Defense

SCO's claims are barred because IBM has not engaged m any unlawful
or unfair business practices, and IBM's conduct was privileged, performed
in the exercise of an absolute right, proper and/or justified.

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:24 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626) [Link]

Licensed typed twice

22. States that it is without information sufficient to form a
belief as to the truth of the averments of paragraph 22, except admits
that AT&T Technologies, Inc. licensed licensed certain software to
IBM and Sequent.

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 10, 2003 21:33 UTC (Sun) by entre (guest, #11626) [Link]

"without"

81. States that it is wimout information sufficient to form a belief
as to the truth of the averments of paragraph 81.

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 11, 2003 1:15 UTC (Mon) by niceguy2279 (guest, #13886) [Link]

OCR mistake?

The text of IBM's counterclaims

Posted Aug 11, 2003 14:10 UTC (Mon) by magician (guest, #13906) [Link]

Search for " me " (space m e space) there are, I believe, six occurances in the legal document, all of which should be "the"

Similarly search for " die " (space d i e space) there is one occurance which should also be "the".

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds