The text of IBM's counterclaims
Posted Aug 8, 2003 23:33 UTC (Fri) by
nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to:
The text of IBM's counterclaims by dmantione
Parent article:
The text of IBM's counterclaims
SCO did still violate the GPL, because by compiling a Linux kernel, they link what they claim as non-GPL code to GPL code, which is not allowed.
Not quite right. It's permitted to links non-GPL code to GPL code, as long as none of the provisions of the GPL are violated. (Thus, you can link no-advertising-clause BSD-licensed code to GPLed code freely.)
The problem with SCO's situation is that their non-GPL code has more restrictions than the GPL. That is not allowed, under clause 6 of the GPL.
(
Log in to post comments)