| |||||||||||||
The case of the fraudulent SSL certificatesThe case of the fraudulent SSL certificatesPosted Mar 24, 2011 18:32 UTC (Thu) by jake (editor, #205)In reply to: The case of the fraudulent SSL certificates by gerv Parent article: The case of the fraudulent SSL certificates
> It is untrue and inflammatory to say that "browsers are generally not
> checking the revocation status of certificates".
I don't know about "inflammatory", but it is certainly "untrue". That was my misunderstanding, and has now been corrected above.
jake
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||