Re: [RFC] pstore: Don't use persistent store for normal shutdown
[Posted March 23, 2011 by jake]
| From: |
| Tony Luck <tony.luck-AT-intel.com> |
| To: |
| Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi-AT-hds.com> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [RFC] pstore: Don't use persistent store for normal shutdown |
| Date: |
| Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:01:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID: |
| <AANLkTi=o3fN+aXSodZL_MyDnFczaXCmOjFwReD1jDZQP@mail.gmail.com> |
| Cc: |
| "linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2-AT-infradead.org>,
Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli-AT-gmail.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy-AT-nokia.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro-AT-jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> wrote:
> I think we should introduce a tunable parameter specifying how much data stores into persistent
> ram when normal shutdown happens.
Currently pstore has a /sys/fs/pstore hook to change the amount of data saved.
Christoph Hellwig convinced me that a mount option would be better, so there
is a patch pending to change this:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=130048763005234&...
I can add more options easily (apart from thinking of good names for
the options :-)
But this is beginning to feel over engineered ... I think I'll wait to see
if there are some other (better) ideas before I rush to do this.
-Tony
(
Log in to post comments)