Re: [RFC]A question about kernel's development
[Posted March 23, 2011 by corbet]
| From: |
| Steven Rostedt <rostedt-AT-goodmis.org> |
| To: |
| linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, greg-AT-kroah.com,
akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org, rdunlap-AT-xenotime.net, joe-AT-perches.com |
| Subject: |
| Re: [RFC]A question about kernel's development |
| Date: |
| Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:51:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20110322035148.GM14675@home.goodmis.org> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:33:14AM +0800, Harry Wei wrote:
> Hi us,
> I wanna know our kernel's development
> procedure for details. I just realize
> when we get a stable release, we must
> merge trementous patches into kernel.
> I often watch -rc kernels, -git kernels,
> , -mm kernels and know their promulgators.
> But i don't know their relationships and
> sequences for shaping stable ones.
Well, a quick answer is that when we fix a bug, we tag it with
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Then when it is applied to Linus's tree, Greg then can choose to pull it
into the stable branch.
I also believe that Greg spends lots of lonely nights looking into git
commits, drinking his favorite Latte and cursing at all the git patches
that fix a bug that didn't have a Cc: stable tag attached. He use to
have a huge mane of hair on his head before taking over as stable
maintainer ;)
-- Steve
> Okay, now we want to develop 2.6.38
> to 2.6.39. How many specific steps should we
> do? In fact, i recognize some. But i want to
> understand all the concrete procedures. Could
> anyone help me, thanks in advance.
(
Log in to post comments)