Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 23, 2013
An "enum" for Python 3
An unexpected perf feature
LWN.net Weekly Edition for May 16, 2013
A look at the PyPy 2.0 release
Microsoft sues Barnes and Noble over Android
Posted Mar 22, 2011 18:18 UTC (Tue) by forlwn (guest, #63934)
Every company is competing with an objective: gain user preference with the best balance among selling price vs quality. No one can sell for less than total cost plus a profit margin.
When an exogenous factor is added to cost, like the M$ tax, legal expenses, lobbying expenses and the like, the compensations are: less quality (cost reduction), less profit, higher selling prices. These measures damage the technological development because funds available and motivation for R&D will be less (why shall I make an effort to invent if I know that my invention will be stolen by a shark?)
Those who collect the proceeds from royalties will not do R%D because is useless. The monopoly position allow to simply don't care. That is the reason why Windows XP had the ridicule life time of around 10 years, was replaced by a worst and mediocre OS (Vista) and at the end Windows 7 was an improvement only because someone felt some fear when both Apple and Linux showed capable of advancing in that core market.
Android / Chrome / linux / open source, have a huge potential to threaten the Microsoft's core and peripheral business. They don't need to compete doing better. Its more cost effective for them to spread FUD by litigating. Money is an asset and they have lots of it. The competitors do not. Then they use it to compete.
The consumers will pay again. More for worst, at each gadget purchase.
Posted Mar 22, 2011 20:02 UTC (Tue) by klbrun (subscriber, #45083)
Have you checked the price of a browser recently?
Posted Mar 22, 2011 21:02 UTC (Tue) by martinfick (subscriber, #4455)
Posted Mar 22, 2011 22:22 UTC (Tue) by klbrun (subscriber, #45083)
Posted Mar 22, 2011 22:22 UTC (Tue) by Wol (guest, #4433)
Several supermarkets are allegedly selling it for less than the taxes on it.
Posted Mar 23, 2011 9:16 UTC (Wed) by oldtomas (guest, #72579)
Have you checked the price of malware recently?
Sad as it sounds: browsers are taking the place of malware more and more. "Loss leaders" is the technical term, AFAIR.
Yes, the intentions of the Mozilla Foundation may be laudable (and they are buying us a couple of years: hadn't Microsoft busted it by killing Netscape off too early, in its unlimited greed, we'd possibly be at that point by now), but the vulnerability of this whole construction to corporate greed is just mind-numbing:
Users are not the clients. Users are the wares.
Posted Mar 24, 2011 4:09 UTC (Thu) by forlwn (guest, #63934)
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds